Discover
I sit with your team and measure where the hours go. Task by task. Then I rank what AI should take on by hours saved, risk and effort.
- Timeline
- [ 2–3 weeks ]
- Output
- A ranked shortlist, costed in hours.

I help finance and professional-services teams find the work AI should take off their desks. Then I build it, ship it and get people using it.
Most firms I meet have a list. Twenty ideas, sometimes a hundred. A pilot or two. A licence nobody opens. The ideas aren't wrong. They're unmeasured, unranked and unowned. So nothing gets built properly, and nothing gets used.
I sit with your team and measure where the hours go. Task by task. Then I rank what AI should take on by hours saved, risk and effort.
I build working tools myself, in days or weeks. In the stack you already run, with access controls and an audit trail from day one.
Workshops for the team. Then 1-2-1s at people's desks, on their own work. I stay until the tools are part of the week.
Capable teams losing hours every week to checking, re-keying and chasing information between systems. Plenty of AI ideas, none of them in production.
Time at the desks with each team. Every recurring task is timed and logged in one pipeline, with an owner and a cost in hours, then ranked by value, effort and risk with the team leads.
Tools in daily use, owned by the teams that run them, and the hours they free up measured against the starting point.
Inside your AI policy and security review. A person checks every output before it is used, and your data stays inside your own environment.
I'm an engineer. I've spent my career shipping software people use.
I measure the work before I suggest anything.
I build the tools myself, in your stack.
I stay until your team uses them.
Thirty minutes. Bring the list. We'll find the two or three ideas worth building.